How a 0.5% difference in superannuation fees costs you $100,000 by retirement

Say WHAT?

A man in his 30s holds his laptop and operates it with his other hand as he has a look of pleasant surprise on his face as though he is learning something new or finding hidden value in something on the screen.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Superannuation fund provider Vanguard says a 0.5% difference in fees can cost the typical full-time worker about 12% of their balance – equivalent to $100,000 – by the time they reach retirement.

This explains why it's so important for Australians to understand the fees they are paying to their superannuation funds.

Vanguard notes that some funds charge up to six types of fees, including an insurance premium, and multiple fees can add up to the extent that they can delay the timing of people's retirement.

But a lack of transparency makes it incredibly hard to understand what fees you are paying, says Daniel Shrimski, Managing Director of Vanguard Australia.

Superannuation fees too difficult to compare

New research by Vanguard found more than 60% of Australians are confused about their superannuation fees and wouldn't feel confident explaining how they are charged.

In an article, Shrimski says this is "hardly surprising", and comments further:

Comparing fees across super funds can be difficult because there are inconsistencies across the industry in how they're disclosed – some funds charge three fees, others charge six; fees are called different things and capture different charges.

While there are rules around the formal product disclosure documents for super funds, when it comes to how fees are marketed on websites, social media and in advertising, there's no consistency.

Vanguard's research also showed one-third of Australians have never compared fees between different superannuation funds.

Shrimski said Australians deserved to have a full and clear picture of the fees they are paying:

…it's not reasonable to expect Australians to comb through product disclosure statements to find the information they need to compare their super fees. Nor, I would argue, is it fair.

Funds shouldn't be making it hard and complicated for Australians to find, see and clearly understand their super fees.

Vanguard says up to six types of fees can be charged. They are called administration fees, investment fees, transaction fees, activity fees, performance fees, and an insurance premium.

Vanguard is a relatively new player in Australia's superannuation landscape. It is trying to differentiate itself in several ways, including simplifying fees.

Shrimski explains:

In contrast, Vanguard Super presents a total fee on a yearly fee basis which incorporates the investment cost, administration fee and transaction costs…

There's also an easy-to-use calculator on our website; all you need to do is enter your super balance.

Vanguard's Chief Investment Officer Duncan Burns said a superannuation fund's investment performance and its fees are the two factors that will "materially impact your superannuation balance at retirement".

Many Australian workers are not only unaware or unsure of the fees they are paying but also of how their superannuation fund is performing.

A Finder survey revealed 49% of Australians – the equivalent of 10.2 million people – have no idea how their superannuation fund is performing.

How much super do you need for retirement?

According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), workers need $100,000 in super by age 67 to fund a modest retirement lifestyle.

A comfortable lifestyle requires more super savings: $595,000 for singles and $690,000 for couples.

Motley Fool contributor Bronwyn Allen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Retirement

A middle-aged couple dance in the street to celebrate their ASX share gains
Retirement

Buy these ASX 200 shares for your retirement portfolio

Analysts think these high-quality stocks could be great options for retirees.

Read more »

Loving senior couple at the swimming pool. Senior woman sitting on the edge of the pool and giving lemonade to her husband who is swimming.
Retirement

2 ASX shares I think would be excellent buys for retirement

These stocks are compelling ideas for dividends and growth in my view.

Read more »

worried couple looking at their retirement savings
Retirement

Pension and home ownership not enough to meet basic living costs in retirement: survey

Older Australians are also increasingly concerned about aged care costs.

Read more »

Retirement

Retiring soon? Here are the ASX shares to buy

These stocks could be great options for a retirement portfolio according to analysts.

Read more »

Happy young couple saving money in piggy bank.
Retirement

What is the average amount people save for their retirement?

How much of your income should you be putting aside?

Read more »

Couple holding a piggy bank, symbolising superannuation.
Retirement

3 of the best ASX 200 retirement shares to buy in October

Analysts think these strong stocks could be great options for investors right now.

Read more »

An older gentleman leans over his partner's shoulder as she looks at a tablet device while seated at a table in their classic Australian old person's home, complete with comfortable furniture and family photographs on the walls.
Retirement

Can you earn ASX dividend income and still get the pension?

Let's find out.

Read more »

Older couple enjoying the backyard
Retirement

Why these ASX 200 shares could be excellent picks for a retirement portfolio

Analysts have buy ratings on these shares. Let's see what they are saying.

Read more »