Here's the latest on the suspension of Star shares

Star's suspension continues. But what's the latest?

| More on:
A young man goes over his finances and investment portfolio at home.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Star Entertainment Group Ltd (ASX: SGR) shares have yet to make an appearance on the ASX boards in September.

The embattled casino and resorts operator requested a trading halt last week for a number of reasons.

In case you missed it, here's what the company stated:

The reasons for the request are as follows:

i. The Star notes that the final report following the 2024 Independent Inquiry into The Star undertaken by Adam Bell SC (in accordance with the Casino Control Act 1992 (NSW) (the Report)) has today been provided to The Star and released by the NSW Independent Casino Commission (NICC). The Star is considering the Report and implications it may have for disclosures concerning its financial results for the year ended 30 June 2024 (FY24 Results);

ii. The Star is finalising other disclosures in relation to its FY24 Results; and

iii. The Star intends to respond to other matters raised in media articles referring to, among other things, The Star's FY24 Results and its financial and liquidity position.

The original trading halt request was until 2 September. However, this halt has since turned into a suspension by the ASX after Star failed to lodge the relevant periodic report by its due date.

What's the latest?

Star shares won't be returning to trade today, but it has released a market update to keep shareholders informed with what's going on.

According to the release, the company notes that there have been multiple media articles in respect of various matters including its financial and liquidity position and the implications of the report by Adam Bell SC following the 2024 Independent Inquiry into The Star.

In response to these matters, Star said:

The Star is currently reviewing its financial and liquidity position with various advisers in the context of seeking to finalise its preliminary financial report for the financial year ended 30 June 2024 (FY24), including holding discussions with various stakeholders in relation to its liquidity position in light of adverse trading and other conditions.

The Company confirms that the advice being provided has extended, from time to time, to considering the application of provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (including the safe harbour provisions).

What does this mean?

Star noted that it is considering the application of provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), including the safe harbour provisions. But what does this mean?

Australia's leading independent law firm, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, explains:

The safe harbour provides directors with protection from liability for insolvent trading provided they have begun developing a course of action that is reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company and the company's creditors than the appointment of a voluntary administrator or liquidator.

The safe harbour is intended to give directors breathing space to consider innovative solutions and to take reasonable, considered risks to restructure viable companies without necessarily exposing the company to the stigmatism of formal, public insolvency processes.

Clearly things are looking very dire for Star shares and its shareholders.

Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

A man in a suit face palms at the downturn happening with shares today.
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

Why is this ASX 300 stock crashing 15% today?

Let's see how this popular stock is performing so far in FY 2025.

Read more »

Happy couple laughing while shopping in supermarket
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

Coles shares: Broker says the 'risk-reward is attractive'

Ord Minnett has good things to say about the supermarket giant following its quarterly update.

Read more »

A man looks a little perplexed as he holds his hand to his head as if thinking about something as he stands in the aisle of a supermarket.
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

Down 20% this year, can Woolworths shares catch a break?

The headlines continue this week.

Read more »

A man looks sadly away from his computer screen as he holds a slice of pizza in his hand with an open pizza box in front of him on his desk.
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

3 reasons this expert is selling Domino's shares now

Down 48% in 2024, why this investing expert recommends selling Domino’s shares.

Read more »

a car driver sits up and looks alert with wide eyes and an expression of concentration while he holds the wheel of a car.
Share Fallers

Why this ASX All Ordinaries stock just crashed 24%!

Investors are punishing the ASX All Ords company today. Let’s find out why.

Read more »

woman holding man's hand as he falls representing ups and downs of ASX investing
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

Why did this ASX 200 stock just crash 11%?

Investors appear nervous about a $475 million acquisition.

Read more »

Man pointing at a blue rising share price graph.
Earnings Results

Guess which ASX All Ords share is soaring on 21% FY 2024 growth

Investors are piling into the ASX All Ords share today. Let’s find out why.

Read more »

Young couple having pizza on lunch break at workplace.
Consumer Staples & Discretionary Shares

Is Warren Buffett buying Domino's shares while they're down?

Could this be a vote of approval?

Read more »