$10k with Warren Buffett vs Cathie Wood: Who would've made you richer?

The two celebrity investors have diametrically opposite styles. Here's who won if you put money in each fund back in 2014.

A couple are happy sitting on their yacht.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

When it comes to contrasting styles, there are no two celebrity investors that are more polar opposites than Warren Buffett and Cathie Wood.

US financial expert and buy-and-hold advocate Brian Feroldi described how Wood is well-known for backing "young, innovative, and 'risky' stocks". 

"Her valuation decisions are based mainly on a company's opportunity," he said in his newsletter.

"In the other corner is Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B). Buffett prefers highly predictable, mature businesses that return cash to shareholders. His valuation decisions are based mainly on a company's actual performance."

So if you put $10,000 into each fund back in 2014, which strategy performed better?

Let's take a look:

How the funds were doing after 5 and 7 years

According to Feroldi, after five years, Wood's ARK Innovation ETF (NYSEARCA: ARKK) was slightly ahead.

"The ARK investment reaches $20,300, thanks to investments in 3D printing, Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA), and other tech companies," he said.

"Berkshire Hathaway grows to $15,200. A notable move — Berkshire now owns a big chunk of Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL)."

By 2021, after the investments had seven years to grow, Wood was absolutely killing it.

"Buoyed by the pandemic, the investment in ARK is now worth an astounding $63,700 — making Wood one of the most famous investors in the world," said Feroldi.

"It seems like Buffett might be getting too old for the investment game: the Berkshire investment is worth far less: $20,600."

The shocking conclusion 

But what about now? How are they performing after nine years of returns?

Incredibly, it's neck and neck.

"The onset of inflation and Fed rate hikes hit ARK's investments hard. Your original investment is now worth $23,400 — over 60% less than two years ago," said Feroldi.

"Buffett's investments, however, are far less affected. They eclipse Wood's returns, standing at $24,500."

So what's the moral of the story?

Over the long term, different approaches can still take you to the same destination.

"The returns are essentially identical, and both have helped investors more than double their money," Feroldi said.

"Investment styles can be diametrically opposed and still accomplish their goals."

Working out what you want out of your investments

This is why investment strategy depends so much on personal circumstances and tastes. There is a reason why all the financial advice you hear and read in the media is called "general advice".

Ultimately nothing beats making decisions based on your personal situation.

To work out your own preferences, Feroldi suggested asking these questions of yourself:

  • Is your primary goal to grow your principal? Beat inflation? Generate income? Protect your downside?
  • Is your time horizon less than a year? Three years? Decades?
  • How much volatility are you willing to endure (in both directions)?
  • Is valuation an essential part of your process or an afterthought?

He admitted the answers may not come easily.

"They might also change over time as you gain investing experience — and life throws a few curveballs your way.

"But figuring out your investing style is essential if you want to achieve your financial goals."

Motley Fool contributor Tony Yoo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Investing Strategies

A person with a round-mouthed expression clutches a device screen and looks shocked and surprised.
Small Cap Shares

Guess which small cap ASX share could rise 100%+

A leading broker is tipping big returns from this speculative stock.

Read more »

Middle age caucasian man smiling confident drinking coffee at home.
Dividend Investing

These blue chip ASX 200 dividend stocks offer 5% yields

Brokers think these blue chips would be top options for income investors. But why?

Read more »

Two smiling work colleagues discuss an investment or business plan at their office.
Dividend Investing

2 ASX dividend shares I'd buy for high yields

These stocks offer investors the potential of a lot of passive income.

Read more »

Two smiling work colleagues discuss an investment or business plan at their office.
Dividend Investing

These 200 ASX dividend shares could be top buys for passive income

Analysts have good things to say about these income options.

Read more »

A man holding a cup of coffee puts his thumb up and smiles while at laptop.
Dividend Investing

Buy Woodside and this high-yield ASX dividend share next week

Analysts think big yields could be on the cards for owners of these stocks.

Read more »

Mini house on a laptop.
Dividend Investing

Do ASX 200 dividend shares out-earn Aussie property?

We compare the forecast FY25 dividend yields of the top 10 ASX 200 companies to rental property yields.

Read more »

Male hands holding Australian dollar banknotes, symbolising dividends.
Index investing

Does the Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (VGS) pay reliable dividends?

This index fund does pay dividends, but there's a catch.

Read more »

Humorous child with homemade money-making machine.
How to invest

How I'd fill an empty ASX share portfolio to build a $500 monthly passive income machine

Building an ASX passive income portfolio simpler than you may think.

Read more »