How shares with massive PE ratios can be cheap

Price-to-earnings is a quick way to gauge how high the share price is compared to the current state of the business. But is it flawed?

| More on:
cheap shares represented by hand crossing out the 'un' in 'unaffordable' using red marker

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

A fund manager has pointed out a very common trap that investors fall into when evaluating shares to buy.

Price-to-earnings (PE) ratio is a metric regularly used by professional and retail investors to determine whether a stock is fairly priced.

The ratio has blown out in the past 10 to 12 years since the global financial crisis, especially among fast-growing growth stocks which have seen their share prices skyrocket.

A classic example of this is REA Group Limited (ASX: REA), which now has a PE ratio of almost 150 after its share price grew from less than $10 eleven years ago to now $156.70. 

Compare this to a value share such as Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC), which is currently going for a PE ratio of around 21.

Over in the United States, electric car maker Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) is trading with a PE ratio of more than 660.

So investors could understandably think REA and Tesla shares are very expensive. They would worry how long it would take for earnings to 'catch up' with the stock value.

Using PE ratios is 'lazy'

Forager chief investment officer Steve Johnson warned that PE ratios can be hopelessly "flawed" when analysing rapidly growing companies.

"'Rocket to the Moon' trades at 40x earnings, therefore it is expensive: It's a lazy conclusion (I've been guilty)," Johnson posted on Livewire.

"And it can be very wrong."

Heuristics are mental shortcuts humans use to make judgment easier and less overwhelming. But they can lead us to the wrong answer.

"All of these heuristics, or rules of thumb, have assumptions behind them that need to be probed," said Johnson.

"Under what scenario is 40 times earnings expensive? What would it take for 40 times earnings to be cheap?"

Businesses that grow for many years can make PE ratios look silly, Johnson added.

"When a company compounds earnings exponentially, the fair value can be a seemingly absurdly high multiple of early-year earnings."

Companies that always looked expensive via PE ratio

Johnson took the example of Cochlear Limited (ASX: COH) — a company he dismissed in the past, based on a high PE ratio.

Twenty years ago, the medical device firm was trading around the $35 to $40 range, giving it a PE ratio of more than 30.

Cochlear has since grown 15% per annum, according to Johnson. The stock is going for $218.81 on Friday afternoon.

"With the benefit of hindsight, you could have paid 150 times earnings and have still generated a 10% annual return (including dividends)."

Fellow ASX healthcare darling CSL Limited (ASX: CSL) has gone through a similar journey, with investors ignoring it for decades with a perception that it's 'expensive'.

But then after persistent growth over many years, 2016 to 2017 saw a change in public opinion.

"Conversation shifted from 'expensive' to 'you pay up for quality'; and more and more investors, both professional and retail, joined the fan club," said FNArena editor Rudi Filapek-Vandyck last month.

"What helped growing enthusiasm was that CSL shares kept on keeping on. First past $100, then $200, and even $300 was not a bridge too far."

Tony Yoo owns shares of CSL Ltd. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. owns shares of and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. owns shares of Cochlear Ltd. and CSL Ltd. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Cochlear Ltd. and REA Group Limited. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.

More on How to invest

Smiling woman with her head and arm on a desk holding $100 notes out, symbolising dividends.
How to invest

How to earn $1,000 a month in passive income from ASX shares

Want a wage from the share market? Here's how to do it.

Read more »

Male hands holding Australian dollar banknotes, symbolising dividends.
How to invest

How to build a $250,000 ASX share portfolio by 2035

Here's how you could potentially reach $250k from zero in just a decade.

Read more »

A businesswoman weighs up the stack of cash she receives, with the pile in one hand significantly more than the other hand.
How to invest

How I'd build a $20,000 annual passive income stream from these top ASX 200 shares

To earn $20,000 a year in passive income, I’d start with these three ASX 200 shares.

Read more »

a smiling picture of legendary US investment guru Warren Buffett.
How to invest

Life after Warren Buffett: other successful investors still in the game worth following

With Warren Buffett retiring it’s time to look at some other investors delivering solid returns.  

Read more »

An older woman gazes over the top of her glasses with a quizzical expression as if she is considering some information.
How to invest

How to build an ASX ETF portfolio to match your risk profile

Time for a portfolio review?

Read more »

A man sits cross-legged in a zen pose on top of his desk as papers fly around his head, keeping calm amid the volatility.
How to invest

Why market volatility is an ASX stock picker's best friend

Here's why you shouldn't fear market volatility.

Read more »

A businessman compares the growth trajectory of property versus shares.
How to invest

Why does Warren Buffett prefer shares over property?

Equities made Buffett the world's most successful investor.

Read more »

Person holding Australian dollar notes, symbolising dividends.
How to invest

Should I spend $5,000 on ASX 200 shares or ASX ETFs this month?

Where is the best place to invest these funds? Let's look at the options.

Read more »