Investors should avoid getting burned by complex ETFs

Although returns may appear lucrative, many will not even recoup their initial investment in these exotic ETFs.

Illustration of a bear and bull facing each other either side of a disc that says ETF

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

Investors interested in gaining access to the stock and bond markets currently enjoy a wide variety of possibilities as the universe of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has grown. For the most part, this growth in low-cost, easy-to-access ETFs has been a boon for investors. However, while gaining access to niche sectors of the market through these products has never been easier, the risk to investors getting burned in some of these funds has increased.

As the popularity of exchange-traded funds has grown, providers have begun to create more intricate securities. In general, ordinary investors should avoid these less-understood funds. Some of these newer, more complex products come with higher risks and are not appropriate for the average investment portfolio.

Understanding the difference between standard and complex funds

Most investors have a strong grasp on how exchange-traded funds operate. In a standard ETF, the value of the security will correlate exactly with the value of an underlying basket of stocks or bonds. The SPDR S&P 500 is a good example of a standard fund.

This is not necessarily the case with more intricate securities. These more complex products go beyond simply imitating an underlying basket of stocks and bonds. An example is the Proshares UltraPro Short S&P 500, which utilizes debt, also known as leverage, in their investments to augment their profits (or losses). The added complexity is what makes an investment like this potentially dangerous.

Another example of this exotic ETF product is the United States Oil Fund (NYSEMKT: USO), which attempts to track the performance of a global oil price index. In this case, the security utilizes futures contracts in order to achieve the performance of the underlying market. However, the value of futures contracts can be affected by many factors that have no correlation to the oil market, such as interest rate levels and time until expiration. It is quite possible that the security's value could be negatively affected by factors that have nothing to do with movements in the oil market.

In fact, many investors lost money in the USO back in April as front month futures contracts went to zero during upheaval in the oil markets. This was a situation that the oil market (and its investors) had never experienced before.

How investing in these complex securities can go wrong

It is difficult, if not impossible, for ordinary investors to fully understand the underlying risks and how these instruments are going to perform under different market conditions. This is particularly the case in extremely volatile markets like the COVID-19 financial crisis.

An example of this involves long/short funds, such as the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores (NYSEMKT: CLIX). Long/short funds are patterned after an institutional hedge fund strategy that aims to buy stocks that they believe have a strong chance of increasing in value and sell stocks short that they believe should lose in value.

In theory, investors can expect this strategy to do well during periods of volatility, like we just experienced in the COVID-19 crisis. Todd Rosenbluth, head of ETF and mutual-fund research at CFRA said, "This seemed like it was a great environment for long-short strategies as we saw U.S. equities fall into a bear market and subsequently recover much of the losses." However, that did not happen. As Mr. Rosenbluth points out, "The majority of funds in the category lost money, some substantially."

Understanding the underlying risks is challenging

Many of these products have been created to track the performance of markets which historically have been the domain of expert institutional investment professionals. These professionals have extensive research staffs and fully understand the risks that they are undertaking. Unfortunately, this is not the case for most ordinary investors.

Global oil markets and long/short strategies are just two examples of this. Case in point, many professional oil traders warned investors to avoid trading oil funds during the market upheaval in April. Those that did not heed this warning lost money.

Exchange traded funds are an amazing innovation that help investors gain quick and inexpensive access to broad market diversification. However, it can be extremely difficult for ordinary investors to fully understand the risks of the more complex securities. If investors do not fully understand the risks and rewards of a particular strategy, it is best not to invest at all.

This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin.ℏ right now?

Before you buy Bitcoin.ℏ shares, consider this:

Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Bitcoin.ℏ wasn't one of them.

The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys...

See The 5 Stocks *Returns as of 30 April 2025

The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on International Stock News

Legendary share market investing expert and owner of Berkshire Hathaway Warren Buffett
International Stock News

Warren Buffett's $347 billion warning to Wall Street is ringing out loud and clear. History says this happens next.

Let's take a look.

Read more »

Warren Buffet
International Stock News

Warren Buffett nearly made his biggest investment since 2022. Here's what's holding him back.

Buffett said Berkshire came close to spending $10 billion, and he'd happily spend $100 billion.

Read more »

Happy man working on his laptop.
International Stock News

Here's why Amazon is a brilliant buy now (Hint: It's not e-commerce)

Fortunately for investors, cloud computing is going through a massive boom.

Read more »

A man looking at his laptop and thinking.
International Stock News

With Warren Buffett stepping down as CEO, will Berkshire Hathaway sell Apple stock?

Or will it find something else to invest in? Let's take a look.

Read more »

Man on his laptop standing next to data centres.
International Stock News

History says now is the time to buy Nvidia stock

History doesn't normally repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

Read more »

Woman relaxing and using her Apple device
International Stock News

16 words from Warren Buffett that should have Apple stock investors excited

Let's see what Buffett had to say and what it means for investors.

Read more »

Legendary share market investing expert and owner of Berkshire Hathaway Warren Buffett
International Stock News

Prediction: Warren Buffett may be shifting out of his Berkshire Hathaway CEO role, but he's not done investing

Let's take a closer look at what may be ahead.

Read more »

A woman sits in a cafe wearing a polka dotted shirt and holding a latte in one hand while reading something on a laptop that is sitting on the table in front of her
International Stock News

Here's why I'm not too worried for Alphabet despite Apple's potential new AI-powered Safari search

Investors panicked when the possibility was floated, but take a step back and look at the bigger picture.

Read more »