Why the SEEK share price just hit a 52-week low

The SEEK Limited (ASX: SEK) share price is falling again today.

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

a woman

The SEEK Limited (ASX: SEK) share price hit a 52-week low of $16.30 this morning as investors continue to fret over the outlook for new job listings in Australia in 2019.

Recently broker Citigroup estimated that new job listings for SEEK fell around 1% over November 2018 and its core business remains reliant on the revenue from new job listings.

SEEK is probably more leveraged to the economic cycle than digital classifieds rivals REA Group Limited (ASX: REA) or Carsales.Com Ltd (ASX: CAR) as companies in the mining or hospitality sectors for example will hire a lot more during good economic times. For example when commodity prices are high and rising miners will hire a lot more, although the reverse is true on the way down.

As such the outlook for SEEK in 2019 looks tough, despite its South East Asian operations and Chinese business Zhaopin.

The latter is growing its top-line strongly, but at a heavy investment cost, which is a similar pattern across the group for SEEK at the moment as it reinvests heavily in order to defend its competitive position, develop technology and grow its businesses. However, it still trades on a high valuation given the flat profit growth.

Motley Fool contributor Tom Richardson owns shares of SEEK Limited. You can find Tom on Twitter @tommyr345 The Motley Fool Australia has recommended SEEK Limited. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on 52-Week Lows

A group of friends push their van up the road on an Australian road.
52-Week Lows

This ASX 200 stock just hit a multi-year low. Here's what's behind the slide

CAR Group shares hit a multi-year low as selling continues.

Read more »

comical investor reading documents and surrounded by calculators
Broker Notes

6 ASX shares at 52-week lows: Buy, hold, or sell?

The market finished lower on Thursday as the conflict in Iran dragged on.

Read more »

A wine technician in overalls holds a glass of red wine up to the light and studies it.
52-Week Lows

Treasury Wine shares just tumbled to 14-year lows. Screaming bargain or falling knife?

Trading at 14-year lows, are Treasury Wine shares poised for a rebound?

Read more »

Three sky divers 'falling with style'.
Share Fallers

4 ASX All Ords shares at 52-week lows: Buy, hold, or sell?

Three of these stocks have more than halved in value over the past 12 months.

Read more »

Buy now written on a red key with a shopping trolley on an Apple keyboard.
Broker Notes

6 ASX All Ords shares at 52-week lows: Experts say buy

Here are the experts' 12-month share price targets on each of these buy-rated stocks.

Read more »

Business women working from home with stock market chart showing per cent change on her laptop screen.
52-Week Lows

CSL and these ASX 200 stocks just hit 52-week lows: Should you buy the dip?

Market volatility has pushed a number of high-quality stocks lower. Here’s how I’m thinking about this.

Read more »

Child investor of ASX shares sitting alongside homemade money-making machine.
52-Week Lows

Are these 3 ASX shares at 52-week lows going cheap?

These ASX All Ords shares have tumbled over 12 months to new 52-week lows. Should you buy?

Read more »

A young woman wearing a red and white striped t-shirt puts her hand to her chin and looks sideways as she wonders whether to buy ASX shares
Broker Notes

3 ASX 200 shares at 52-week lows: Buy, hold, or sell?

These ASX 200 shares have experienced significant falls over the past 12 months. Is there value here?

Read more »